stereoguide.com
  • Home
  • Bluetooth Speakers
    • Home/Indoor
    • Mobile/Outdoor
    • Stereo Speaker Sets
    • Bluetooth Speaker Ranking
  • Headphones
    • In-Ears
    • On-Ear/Over-Ear
    • Noise-Cancelling
    • True Wireless
    • Gaming Headsets
    • Headphones Ranking
  • Hi-Fi Speakers
    • WIFI Onebox
    • WIFI Stereo
    • Soundbars
    • Hi-Fi Ranking
  • Car-Hi-Fi
    • Car Hi-Fi reviews
    • Car-Hi-Fi reports
    • Car Hi-Fi Ranking
  • Guides
    • News
    • Buying Guides
    • Technology
    • Acoustics
    • Streaming
  • About us
    • Our approach
    • About us
  • English
    • German
stereoguide.com
  • Home
  • Bluetooth Speakers
    • Home/Indoor
    • Mobile/Outdoor
    • Stereo Speaker Sets
    • Bluetooth Speaker Ranking
  • Headphones
    • In-Ears
    • On-Ear/Over-Ear
    • Noise-Cancelling
    • True Wireless
    • Gaming Headsets
    • Headphones Ranking
  • Hi-Fi Speakers
    • WIFI Onebox
    • WIFI Stereo
    • Soundbars
    • Hi-Fi Ranking
  • Car-Hi-Fi
    • Car Hi-Fi reviews
    • Car-Hi-Fi reports
    • Car Hi-Fi Ranking
  • Guides
    • News
    • Buying Guides
    • Technology
    • Acoustics
    • Streaming
  • About us
    • Our approach
    • About us
  • English
    • German
stereoguide.com
Home » Headphones » In-Ears » Final B-3 review
In-Ears

Final B-3 review

Warm audiophile sound like from really big hi-fi headphones
Stereo GuideBy Stereo Guide12. December 2021
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
In-Ear Final B-3 against white background
The in-ear Final B-3 is recommended for top sound on the go. (Photo: Final)
90%
90%

+ outstandingly natural, slightly warm sound
+ transparent and spacious, yet detailed
+ ideal for long listening, never exhausting
- less spectacular, low bass doesn't pop as much
- external amplification necessary for higher dynamics

  • Sound: Tonal Balance / Transparency
    10
  • Sound: Bass / Dynamics
    9
  • Ease-of-use / Connectivity
    8
  • Price/Performace
    9

500 Euro is certainly a lot of money for a passive InEar-earphone, which still needs a corresponding control. But for the Japanese headphone specialist, the Final B-3 only ranks in the middle class. However, if you take the set in hand, you get the impression to get a good value here. Everything feels quality and sturdy – from the tightly woven cable to the earphones’ perceived quite heavy, bead-blasted stainless steel housings and finely graduated earpieces.

The philosophy of whether in-ear headphones should be equipped with a full-range driver or a multi-way system has always divided the high-end minds. Final has several philosophies in its portfolio, and is looking for a happy medium with the B-3. It is true that the B-3 has a full-range driver, in which all audible frequencies are converted by the same diaphragm. However, it is connected to an additional tweeter that runs along the top. Both are designed as transducers known under the name Balanced-Armature. They are similar to the dynamic principle with electromagnetic voice coil and membrane. However, here the electromagnet through which the music signal flows moves with its two ends in two inversely polarized magnetic fields. This allows an extremely low moving mass, and problems with inhomogeneous magnetic fields and resonances are also almost non-existent. A pair of them provides higher sound pressure and reduces the risk of resonances and cancellations in the pressure chamber and the sound channels.

Practicality and intended use

The Final B-3 is a passive in-ear headphone, so it requires a headphone preamp or a suitably potent smartphone with an analog output. In testing, commercially available modern smartphones delivered enough voltage to drive the B-3 to perfectly adequate volumes for pop, rock and jazz. However, anyone who listens to classical music with quiet passages or likes to have a bit more dynamics at the ear should definitely consider purchasing a mobile music player or D/A converter with higher output power.

Only a symmetrically branching cable with a 3.5 mm jack plug is supplied as a connector, so a headset function is not provided. The cables are fed to the capsules from the front and then routed over the ears to the back. A retaining bracket not only makes the construct more stable. It also provides a secure grip when moving, although you can feel the slightly increased weight of the steel case when moving.

The Final B-3 must be placed tightly in the ear canal, rubber earmolds in 5 different sizes are supplied. In the test, each test person found their matching earpieces. Fortunately, the sound channels don’t have to be pushed in too deep, so the feeling in the ear is quite comfortable. At most, test persons with small ear cups can feel the rather angular case slightly resting against the back or top.

This is how the Final B-3 sounds: amazingly warm and audiophile

Right off the bat, the B-3 pleased with an all-around balanced sound that didn’t neglect the ends of the audible spectrum, but didn’t emphasize them either. Unfortunately, this is often the case with in-ear headphones. Compared to the almost overbrilliant, considerably more expensive Sennheiser IE 900, the Final B-3 held back somewhat in the brilliance range with details. On the other hand, voices sounded warmer and more homogeneous than on many competitors, regardless of whether they were on classical, jazz or pop recordings. These often have an emphasis on brilliance in favor of more detail resolution. But this was by no means at the expense of audibility. The B-3 also staggered larger choirs and big bands cleanly and transparently in all details.

The low frequencies blended very harmoniously into the sound spectrum, but remained inconspicuous for the most part. Only with really deep and bass-rich recordings did the B-3 show its low-frequency qualities offensively. It remained true to impulse, even if you may have experienced bass drum hits elsewhere that were harder and richer.

Room imaging is not really the profession of Inear listeners. But at the final, the stage was easy to guess at classical or jazz recordings. The sound image was broad and, as far as possible with this transducer principle, also at an appropriate distance to the listener, largely without the annoying inhead localisation. Especially those who appreciate wide-ranging, diffuse-field equalized over-ear headphones will finally find this sound ideal as an in-ear with the Final B-3.

Conclusion and alternatives to the Final B-3

With its tendency towards slightly warm sound tuning and almost perfect balance of resolution, dynamics and three-dimensionality, the Final B-3 runs somewhat counter to current sound trends. In contrast to him, they tend towards explosive dynamics and resolution. If you’re looking for a high-end InEar with more detailed tuning, there are plenty on the market, such as the Sennheiser IE 300 and the Ultrasone IQ Pro. If you like it warm, spacious and soft, the Final is an excellent choice and even cheaper than the Ultrasone Ruby Sunrise.

  • Price: approx. 500 $
  • Type: In-Ear
  • Transducer principle: Dual BA driver without crossover
  • Nominal impedance: 19 Ohm
  • Weight: 32 g
  • Special Features: MMCX connector, silver coated OFC cable.
  • More at: www.final-inc.com
  • JBL Club ONE review
  • Cayin RU7 USB DAC Dongle review
  • Grell TWS/1 review
  • Sennheiser IE 600 review
  • Headphones Ranking
Stereo Guide – Das HiFi-Magazin Favivon
Stereo Guide

On Stereo Guide you will find competent and objective tests for Bluetooth speakers, headphones and car HiFi by experienced journalists.

Related Posts

Acoustune HS1750Cu review

Tradition and Sci-Fi - a true story about IEMs

Acoustune HS1750Cu review

Sennheiser IE 600 review

Merciless dynamics: stage sound with turbo effect

Sennheiser IE 600 review

Sony WF-1000XM5 review

Private Investigations in sound - the best ANC with great wearing comfort

Sony WF-1000XM5 review

Bowers & Wilkins Pi7 S2 review

This high-end wireless in-ear can stream music by itself

Bowers & Wilkins Pi7 S2 review

Bowers & Wilkins Px8 review

The Brits please the ear, please the eye

Bowers & Wilkins Px8 review

The Px8 is one of the finest Bluetooth headphones on the market and is particularly convincing in terms of wearing comfort, spaciousness and long-term suitability.

JBL Partybox 110 with app review

Compact, lightweight, but powerful: How good is this party box bestseller?

JBL Partybox 110 with app review

9.0

Klipsch Gig XXL review

XXL beats enter the scene: could Klipsch beat JBL´s Partybox 110?

Klipsch Gig XXL review

9.0

Bose Smart Soundbar 600 review

As cheap Dolby Atmos can be: Can that really be from Bose?

Bose Smart Soundbar 600 review

8.7

JBL Soundgear Sense review

How good are the first open-ears from JBL?

JBL Soundgear Sense review

9.2

Audi S8 with B&O Advanced Sound System test drive

Chariot of the gods? We find out if the new S8 has the right stuff

Audi S8 with B&O Advanced Sound System test drive

The Audi S8 combines luxury and dynamics. The driving pleasure benefits not only from its powerful V8, but also from the Bang & Olufsen sound system.

Sony SRS-XB100 review

With app and new sound tuning better than the Sony SRS-XB13?

Sony SRS-XB100 review

The Sony SRS-XB100 replaces XB13. The review will reveal whether it sets an exclamation mark among mini Bluetooth speakers with its app and new tuning.

Shokz OpenFit: Review of the True Wireless Open-Ears

No ANC, but In-ears can't keep up with the sound panorama

Shokz OpenFit: Review of the True Wireless Open-Ears

Thanks to the open-ear principle, the Shokz OpenFit surprised with great spatiality and a comfortable fit in the review. But they also require compromises.

Sonos Move 2 review

Sonos focuses on stereo: Does the 2-channel upgrade really make the Move 2 better?

Sonos Move 2 review

The Sonos Move 2 relies on stereo sound, but it is limited due to its compactness. But it sounded much more grown-up in the review.

JBL Soundgear Sense review

How good are the first open-ears from JBL?

JBL Soundgear Sense review

The JBL Soundgear Sense open-ear headphones surprised us with a listening experience that is closer to hi-fi speakers than the usual in-ears.

STEREO GUIDE – The Hi-Fi Magazine
STEREO GUIDE – The Hi-Fi Magazine

Here on STEREO GUIDE – the online hi-fi-magazine – you will find profound and independent coverage on bluetooth speakers, headphones, home-hifi gear and in-car entertainment reviewed by experienced journalists. Our authors have one thing in common: expertise and a lot of listening experience both in terms of live concerts and state-of-the-art audio systems.

  • Home
  • Data protection
  • Imprint
© 2023 Stereo Guide

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage cookie consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and service.
Functional Always active
Technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the lawful purpose of enabling the use of a particular service expressly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a message over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access used solely for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, the voluntary consent of your Internet service provider, or additional records from third parties, the information stored or accessed for this purpose alone generally cannot be used to identify you.
Marketing
Technical storage or access is necessary to create user profiles, to send advertisements, or to track the user on a website or across multiple websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
Settings
{title} {title} {title}